Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761316›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026

Self-report Instruments for Anxiety, Depression, and Stress in Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Psychometric Properties and Cultural Applicability.

Divyani Srivastava, Dimpy Mahanta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Divyani SrivastavaCotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5674-1038
Dimpy MahantaCotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2483-2215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the Review: This scoping review mapped self-report instruments assessing anxiety, depression, and stress among adolescents, focusing on their psychometric properties and cultural applicability in the Indian context. It was anticipated that most instruments would be developed and validated in Western settings, with limited validation in Indian adolescent samples; that multidimensional tools covering all three constructs would be fewer than single-construct measures, and that cultural and linguistic adaptation for Indian adolescents would be insufficient. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar on July 28, 2024, to identify studies reporting psychometric evaluations of self-report instruments measuring these constructs in adolescents aged 10-19 years, published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Results: Of 2,812 records identified, 15 instruments were retained after deduplication and screening, and most showed acceptable internal consistency and structural validity per COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-informed criteria. Most instruments originated in Western populations; validation in Indian samples remained limited, and none combined all three constructs into a single measure. Conclusions: Existing instruments offer a useful starting point for assessing adolescent anxiety, depression, and stress, but their fit for the Indian context is uneven, with gaps in test-retest evidence, adolescent-specific norms, and cultural adaptation. Progress would benefit from co-development with Indian adolescents, bilingual validation, and evidence gathered mainly from school and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Adolescentsanxietydepressionpsychometric propertiesstress

Identifiers

PMID42761316
PMCPMC13586083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.