ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Profiles and transitions of psychological adaptation in AI-assisted Japanese language learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into language learning, learners may differ in how they adapt psychologically to AI-assisted study. This study examined profiles and transitions of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese language learning and their associations with learning self-efficacy and burnout. A three-wave longitudinal survey was conducted across one academic semester, with 457 learners at Time 1. Technostress and psychological resilience served as indicators in latent profile and latent profile transition analyses. Three profiles were consistently identified: maladaptive adaptation, moderate adaptation, and positive adaptation. The maladaptive adaptation profile decreased from 26.48% at Time 1 to 17.74% at Time 3, whereas the positive adaptation profile increased from 27.35% to 35.73%. The positive adaptation profile showed the greatest temporal stability, while learners in the maladaptive adaptation profile most commonly transitioned to moderate adaptation. At Time 3, learners in the positive adaptation profile reported the highest Japanese learning self-efficacy and the lowest learning burnout, whereas those in the maladaptive adaptation profile showed the reverse pattern. By integrating the Job Demands-Resources framework with a person-centered longitudinal approach, this study demonstrates that psychological adaptation to AI-assisted language learning is heterogeneous, dynamic, and meaningfully associated with learners' confidence and burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.