Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761276›Full record

ArticleJournal of intelligent manufacturing2026

Machine learning nested in multiphysics finite element analysis: application to flash sintering.

Ran He, Mingxuan Xia, Peter Polak, Baber Saleem, Xiaoxia Yu, Jingzhe Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ran HeSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-0411
Mingxuan XiaSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.
Peter PolakSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.
Baber SaleemSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.
Xiaoxia YuSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.
Jingzhe PanSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element modelling is a powerful tool for predicting temperature field and deformation in flash sintering. However, conventional finite element modelling approaches often rely on empirical constitutive models, which struggle to capture the highly complex, nonlinear behaviour of materials under flash sintering conditions. To overcome this limitation, this study develops a framework that can train artificial neural networks (ANNs) when nested in multiphysics finite element analysis. By replacing empirical rules with ANNs, the finite element model can learn directly from data and, thus, operate as a digital twin of the flash sintering process. A two-step training strategy is adopted: pretraining of ANNs using synthetic data generated from empirical rules, followed by nested retraining within a commercial finite element package using experimental data. To enable the second-step training, a novel backpropagation algorithm integrated with the Adam optimiser is developed. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in predictive accuracy: the mean squared error between predicted and measured strains decreased from 0.0316 (modified Olevsky's constitutive law) to 0.0034 (ANNs). Beyond improving model fidelity, the approach enables continual adaptation as new data become available and is extensible to all engineering problems governed by differential equations.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkDigital twinFinite element analysisMultiphysicsNested machine learning

Identifiers

PMID42761276
PMCPMC13585878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.