Trial reportBlood neoplasia2026
Tamibarotene with venetoclax and azacitidine in RARA
Trial report in Blood neoplasia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04905407 (Tamibarotene in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Previously Untreated Adult Patients Selected for RARA-positive AML Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tamibarotene in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Previously Untreated Adult Patients Selected for RARA-positive AML Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RARA overexpression defines a molecularly distinct subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Tamibarotene, an oral selective RARA agonist, synergizes with azacitidine (AZA) but its addition to venetoclax (VEN) with AZA has not been assessed. SY-1425-202 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized study evaluating tamibarotene combined to VEN/AZA (TAMI/VEN/AZA) vs VEN/AZA alone in newly diagnosed RARA-positive, unfit AML. Part 1 assessed the safety of TAMI/VEN/AZA, part 2 randomized participants to TAMI/VEN/AZA vs VEN/AZA, and part 3 explored salvage therapy with TAMI/VEN/AZA after VEN/AZA failure in part 2. TAMI 6 mg twice daily was administered. Randomization occurred after confirmation of RARA positivity by cycle 1, day 8. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in part 2 and part 3, and safety in part 1. In part 1 (n=10), overall response rate (ORR) was 77.8% (5 CR, 2 CRi). In part 2 (n=51), CR/CRi was 60.0% for TAMI/VEN/AZA and 69.2% for VEN/AZA. Median CR/CRi duration was 293 vs 253 days. ORR was 80.0% vs 73.1%, respectively. In part 3, 2 of 5 patients responded (CR, morphologically leukemia-free state). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 76% of patients. Deaths were attributed mainly to disease progression or known complications of therapy; none were attributed to TAMI. The study met prespecified futility criteria and was discontinued early. The addition of TAMI to VEN/AZA was tolerable but did not improve efficacy over VEN/AZA. These results did not demonstrate clinical benefit of TAMI in the frontline unfit RARA-positive AML setting receiving VEN/AZA. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04905407.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.