ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The relationship between AI anxiety and academic motivation among university students: the mediating role of emotion regulation and the moderating role of gender.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in university students' writing, information retrieval, knowledge organisation and task completion. Although AI tools may improve learning convenience and access to resources, they may also generate technological uncertainty, pressure to adapt to new competencies and concerns about future development. As an important negative emotional response in intelligent technology contexts, AI anxiety may be closely associated with university students' academic motivation and psychological adaptation. Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire study recruited 1,484 university students in China using convenience sampling. Participants completed measures of AI anxiety, emotion regulation and academic motivation through the Wenjuanxing online survey platform. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and regression analyses were used to examine associations among variables. The PROCESS macro was used to test the mediation effect and the moderated mediation effect. All indirect effects were estimated using 5,000 bootstrap samples and 95% confidence intervals. Results: AI anxiety was negatively associated with both emotion regulation and academic motivation, whereas emotion regulation was positively associated with academic motivation. Bootstrap analyses showed a significant negative indirect association between AI anxiety and academic motivation through emotion regulation. Gender significantly moderated the association between emotion regulation and academic motivation, with a stronger positive association among male students. Conclusion: AI anxiety may constitute a psychological barrier to students' motivational adaptation to AI-supported learning. Emotion regulation represents one psychological pathway linking AI anxiety to academic motivation, and gender constitutes a boundary condition for this association. These findings suggest that AI literacy education should integrate emotion-regulation and metacognitive support with differentiated learning assistance. Given the cross-sectional and self-reported nature of the data, the findings require further validation using longitudinal or experimental designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.