Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761217›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

Impact of the hidden curriculum and unprofessionalism on medical student specialty choice.

Melissa R George, Kristie L White, Balaram Puligandla, Hailey L Gosnell, Amanda Lofgreen, Kristen Johnson, Stephanie Barak, Mary P Berg, Satyapal Chahar, John M Childs and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Melissa R GeorgeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Kristie L WhiteQuest Diagnostics, Wood Dale, IL, USA.
Balaram PuligandlaDepartment of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Hailey L GosnellCleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Pathology, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Amanda LofgreenCAP Learning, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, USA.
Kristen JohnsonCAP Learning, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, USA.
Stephanie BarakWomen and Infants Hospital, Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mary P BergClinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Satyapal ChaharDepartment of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
John M ChildsGeisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
Barbara E C Knollmann-RitschelDepartment of Pathology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Julie Katz KarpDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cindy B McCloskeyDepartment of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Bronwyn H BryantDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hidden curriculum in medical education refers to implicit lessons not formally taught, including specialty hierarchies, stereotypes, and misconceptions. Pathology, in particular, is often subject to derogatory comments and the perception that communication skills and patient care are wasted in this specialty. This study explored pathology residents' experiences with the hidden curriculum and its impact on medical student education. A survey was administered to pathology trainees to assess demographic trends and specialties associated with positive or negative perceptions of pathology and included free-text responses. Most respondents reported encountering negative remarks about pathology, spanning all levels of training and practice. Reactions to a declared interest in pathology were typically neutral or discouraging. Certain specialties were consistently identified as sources of both positive and negative perceptions. Free-text responses revealed recurring themes: negative views of pathology included concerns about job market instability, low prestige and compensation, potential replacement by artificial intelligence, and stereotypes of pathologists as socially withdrawn. Positive views highlighted work-life balance and intellectual rigor. Many respondents noted that expressing interest in pathology led to being belittled or receiving less educational attention. These findings underscore harmful aspects of the hidden curriculum and unprofessional behavior within medical education. In an era of multidisciplinary care, it is concerning that physicians would disparage other specialties and compromise medical student education in response to a student's planned career choice. Strategies are needed to bring attention to and to break this vicious cycle.

Indexed as

Hidden curriculumProfessionalismSpecialty choice

Identifiers

PMID42761217
PMCPMC13586562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.