ArticleAcademic pathology
Impact of the hidden curriculum and unprofessionalism on medical student specialty choice.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hidden curriculum in medical education refers to implicit lessons not formally taught, including specialty hierarchies, stereotypes, and misconceptions. Pathology, in particular, is often subject to derogatory comments and the perception that communication skills and patient care are wasted in this specialty. This study explored pathology residents' experiences with the hidden curriculum and its impact on medical student education. A survey was administered to pathology trainees to assess demographic trends and specialties associated with positive or negative perceptions of pathology and included free-text responses. Most respondents reported encountering negative remarks about pathology, spanning all levels of training and practice. Reactions to a declared interest in pathology were typically neutral or discouraging. Certain specialties were consistently identified as sources of both positive and negative perceptions. Free-text responses revealed recurring themes: negative views of pathology included concerns about job market instability, low prestige and compensation, potential replacement by artificial intelligence, and stereotypes of pathologists as socially withdrawn. Positive views highlighted work-life balance and intellectual rigor. Many respondents noted that expressing interest in pathology led to being belittled or receiving less educational attention. These findings underscore harmful aspects of the hidden curriculum and unprofessional behavior within medical education. In an era of multidisciplinary care, it is concerning that physicians would disparage other specialties and compromise medical student education in response to a student's planned career choice. Strategies are needed to bring attention to and to break this vicious cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.