Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761205›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026

The evolution of quality assurance.

Amar Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amar ShahChief Scientific Officer, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution and maturity of quality assurance in healthcare remains largely unstudied and undocumented, in comparison to the literature about quality improvement. This article describes the development in thinking around quality assurance over the last four decades - from the first structured organisational framework that made boards accountable for quality, through the clinical governance system set up in the 1990s. Clinical governance brought together a range of disparate components into a coherent structure, which we would largely view as quality assurance today. As practice and learning about quality management has evolved in the subsequent decades, there is an appreciation of the need to balance quality assurance with other elements of quality management - improvement, control and planning. The article presents a detailed case study from East London NHS Foundation Trust which describes how modern quality assurance has become much more patient-led, informed by improvement science, and meaningful, through reducing burden and involving clinicians in quality assurance activities.

Indexed as

AssuranceQualityQuality assuranceQuality management

Identifiers

PMID42761205
PMCPMC13586558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.