ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Predicting first falls among older adults with chronic conditions and polypharmacy using routinely collected health records.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Falls represent a major clinical and financial challenge for healthcare systems. Accurately predicting first falls remains challenging, especially when using routinely collected data. Objective: Develop and evaluate a predictive model to identify elderly people at risk of first fall-defined as a fall after a 90-day fall-free period-in the Basque Country using routinely collected health records. Method: A retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 with at least two chronic conditions among heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes. Data on demographics, diagnoses, prescriptions and healthcare utilisation were obtained from Osakidetza-Basque Health Service databases. Patients were labelled as "fallers" if they fell during 2022-2023 after a 90-day fall-free period rather than a true first-ever fall. Predictive models-logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)-were trained using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) enhanced model interpretability and explainability. Results: 35,197 patients were included, with 10.6% experiencing a fall. All models achieved similar results, with an AUCROC score of 0.71, while precision remained low. Emergency room visits in the prior 3 months, presence of caregiver, and age consistently ranked the top predictors. The number of prescriptions and antidepressant use also emerged as relevant. Discussion: Models showed moderate predictive performance. Relying solely on routinely collected health records limited clinical applicability due to low precision. Future work should integrate diverse data sources-health records, real-time gait and balance metrics, environmental factors-to improve fall prediction and support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.