ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Exploring the role of ascending aortic length to prevent type A acute aortic dissection.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) often occurs before the given threshold for prophylactic surgery. This study investigates the role of the ascending aortic length (AAL) integrated to aortic height index (AHI) as an additional factor in the risk stratification of AAD. Thereby, the relationship between AAL and the aortic diameter, as well as the patient's height, will be evaluated. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for AAD at our Institution between January 2013 and February 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. The size of the aortic organ was retrospectively measured using computed tomography to define the maximum diameter and the length of the ascending segment by means of syngo.via. The AHI and AHI + length (AHIL) were calculated and compared in all patients. A control group without known aortic pathology had their ascending aorta studied using magnetic resonance imaging, including those with a moderate risk of dissection (AHI >= 2.9 cm/m). Results: During the study period, 119 patients were included. The mean aortic diameter at the time of diagnosis was 5.07 ± 0.6 cm, the mean AAL was 11.94 ± 2.23 cm. In the AHI probability density function, the peak for dissection was 2.94 ± 0.36 cm/m, while for AHIL was 9.8 ± 1.15 cm/m. The difference between the AHI and the AHIL in the risk categorization was highly significant ( Conclusion: The addition of ascending aortic length to the aortic height index provides a potentially useful exploratory morphologic index available to the cardiologic community, helping to discriminate individuals within the moderate risk for acute aortic events. Patients with an AHIL exceeding 9.7 cm/m should be referred to an Aortic Center for a proper multidisciplinary risk evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.