ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Media exposure, perceived stereotype accessibility, and national image formation: experimental and short-term panel evidence from Chinese perceptions of Germany.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In highly mediated environments, individuals often form impressions of foreign countries through indirect information rather than direct experience. Drawing on social cognition theory, this study examines how media exposure contributes to national stereotype formation through perceived stereotype accessibility and whether media literacy functions as a boundary condition. Methods: Three complementary studies were conducted among Chinese university students using Germany as the empirical case. Study 1 developed and preliminarily validated a context-specific measure of perceived stereotype accessibility and assessed the measurement properties of the core constructs. Study 2 employed an experimental design to test the causal effects of media exposure on perceived stereotype accessibility and stereotype content. Study 3 used a two-wave short-term panel design to examine the proposed relationships under temporal separation. Results: Across the studies, media exposure did not directly shape overall national attitudes. Instead, it increased the perceived accessibility of stereotype-related representations, which subsequently influenced national stereotype content. This indirect effect was primarily reflected in competence stereotypes rather than warmth stereotypes and was replicated across experimental and short-term panel contexts. Media literacy weakened the effect of media exposure on perceived stereotype accessibility, thereby reducing the downstream influence of media exposure on stereotype formation. Conclusion: The findings identify perceived stereotype accessibility as a key cognitive mechanism linking media exposure to national stereotype formation and demonstrate media literacy as an important boundary condition. The study contributes to research on media effects and national stereotyping by clarifying how mediated information becomes cognitively accessible and shapes stereotype content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.