ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
High-fidelity simulation improves acute pain management competency in final-year medical students.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective acute pain management requires integrating multimodal analgesia, clinical decision-making, and patient safety considerations. Although simulation-based education is increasingly used in medical training, its value for teaching complex acute pain management in undergraduate curricula has not been well established. This study evaluated whether high-fidelity simulation-based learning improved educational outcomes compared with traditional lecture-based teaching among final-year medical students. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post controlled study was conducted at the University of Tabuk Simulation Center in Saudi Arabia between September 2025 and February 2026. Final-year medical students were assigned, according to the academic teaching schedule, to either simulation-based learning or traditional lecture-based instruction. The simulation intervention included three clinically relevant acute pain scenarios. Outcomes included knowledge acquisition, assessed using a 15-item multiple-choice questionnaire; learner confidence, assessed using an 8-item Likert-scale questionnaire; and post-intervention clinical performance, assessed using a standardized competency-based checklist with scores ranging from 0 to 50. Between-group differences and pre-post changes were analyzed. Results: A total of 147 students were included in the final analysis: 73 in the simulation group and 74 in the traditional teaching group. Baseline demographic characteristics, knowledge scores, and confidence scores were comparable between groups (all Conclusions: Simulation-based training was associated with higher knowledge, confidence, and post-intervention performance scores. These findings should be interpreted in light of the quasi-experimental design, nonrandom allocation, and nonblinded assessment. The results support the use of simulation-based approaches in undergraduate pain education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.