ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Does cultural context matter? Comparison of Finnish and Italian children's social-pragmatic comprehension.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While social-pragmatic comprehension has been studied from a number of perspectives, there are only a few studies that focus on cultural factors and their effect on the development of pragmatic processing skills. Previous studies have suggested that various communicative features and different communicative styles may be detected in individuals coming from different contextual backgrounds, even within Europe itself. Methods: In this light, the present study compared the performance of 150 Finnish and 150 Italian children matched for age and gender (age range 4-8 years) on the Pragma Test, a tool that measures social-pragmatic comprehension using structured protocols. Results: Results showed a similar developmental trend in pragmatic comprehension among the two groups, while data suggest the Finnish children performed slightly better across all the age groups, even if at age four and five the difference was less pronounced. A difference in performance emerged at age six and persisted until age eight. Italian and Finnish children performed similarly on questions assessing children's recognition of feelings in context. Differences were noted in questions on contextual processing not involving theory of mind and on understanding the relevant use of language. Finnish children slightly outperformed Italian children in explaining their correct answers. Discussion: This study enhances our understanding of the development of pragmatic comprehension from a cross-cultural perspective. It highlights universal underpinnings in pragmatic processing as well as some cultural influences that bear upon contextual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.