Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Optimizing family building in women of advanced reproductive age: a Faster-Fewer-and-Finished approach.

Sesh K Sunkara, Christos Venetis, Thomas D'Hooghe, Francesca E Duncan, Tamara Hunter, Susana Montenegro, Frank Broekmans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sesh K SunkaraDivision of Women's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christos VenetisUnit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thomas D'HoogheMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Francesca E DuncanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Tamara HunterMonash IVF, Perth, WA, Australia.
Susana MontenegroMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Frank BroekmansProfessor Em. in Reproductive Endocrinology and Surgery, Department of Reproductive Medicine, at the University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed parenthood is a defining feature of contemporary reproductive medicine, fundamentally reshaping reproductive planning and increasing reliance on medically assisted reproduction (MAR). For women of advanced reproductive age (ARA), this shift exposes a potential disconnect between conventional treatment pathways and the biological constraints of ovarian ageing and a rapidly narrowing reproductive window. This risks preventable delays, cumulative treatment burden, and suboptimal outcomes in this population. Addressing these challenges requires deliberate adaptation of current clinical strategies to minimize avoidable delays in assessment and treatment, while ensuring timely, optimized, and outcome-focused care. In this Perspectives article, which is based on expert consensus opinion, we propose a hypothesis-generating framework - the Faster-Fewer-and-Finished (3F) approach - in which expedited evaluation, tailored cycle sequencing, and a patient-tailored 'finish' criterion are applied to maximize time-to-first-live birth or to arrive at a shared decision on how or if to continue, with treatment decisions anchored by individual age and ovarian reserve. The 3F approach prioritizes achieving a live birth or ideal family size in the shortest possible time by advocating the 'fewest' number of ovarian stimulation cycles necessary. While more than one cycle may be unavoidable, the emphasis is on early strategic tailoring of treatment according to age category, efficiency of intervention, and minimizing biological and emotional attrition. By aligning treatment strategies with both the realities of ovarian ageing and the wishes and life priorities of ARA patients, the 3F approach integrates established principles of MAR into a time-critical, outcome-driven theoretical framework for infertility care.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedAdvanced Maternal AgeFemaleHumansOvarian ReserveOvulation InductionPregnancy3F approachadvanced reproductive ageexpert opinionfamily buildingmedically assisted reproductive technologytime to live birthtreatment strategy

Identifiers

PMID42761074
PMCPMC13585630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.