ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Case Report: Reopening the anabolic window - romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab for severe osteoporosis in two kidney transplant recipients.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients develop disorders of mineral and bone metabolism that further impair bone strength, leading to osteoporosis and a high fracture risk. However, evidence in this setting is limited. Romosozumab, a sclerostin inhibitor with both anabolic and antiresorptive effects, is an attractive option, but its use in transplant recipients, as well as its combination with denosumab, has rarely been reported. We describe two female kidney transplant recipients with severe osteoporosis and persistently high fracture risk despite long-term denosumab, in whom romosozumab (210 mg monthly) was added to ongoing denosumab for 12 months. In both patients the bone-formation markers P1NP and BAP rose early, and bone mineral density improved preferentially at the lumbar spine (Case 1 + 5.9%, Case 2 + 11.2%), with only modest changes at the femoral neck and total hip. Serum calcium, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and allograft function remained stable throughout, with no clinically significant hypocalcemia, and neither patient sustained a new vertebral fracture. Adding romosozumab to ongoing denosumab thus reopened the anabolic window and improved lumbar-spine bone mineral density without compromising mineral metabolism or graft function. This combination may represent a reasonable option for carefully selected transplant recipients who continue to lose bone or to fracture despite antiresorptive therapy, pending confirmation in controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.