ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Construction and verification of a nomogram to predict the probability of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer (LC) patients account for 20% of all cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, which is the second leading cause of mortality in these patients. However, there are no LC-specific risk scores for VTE prediction. Therefore, we considered that an LC-specific nomogram would more accurately predict VTE probability for these patients than the current widely used VTE risk scores. Methods: A total of 676 patients from the Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital (January 2016 to September 2021) were included in this study, of which 169 LC patients who developed VTE were time-matched with 507 (1:3 ratio) LC patients without VTE. These patients were randomly divided at a 2:1 ratio to form primary (451) and validation (225) cohorts. The accuracy of six VTE risk scores was assessed by producing area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). A multivariate analysis was employed to select predictive features, which were then used to construct a nomogram for VTE prediction. Results: Among the scoring methods, COMPASS-CAT had the highest AUC (0.799). The multivariate analyses revealed that acute infection, bed rest (>3 days), D-dimer level >1.47 μg/mL, adenocarcinoma, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >10.935 ng/mL were independent predictors of VTE risk for LC patients. The nomogram constructed using these factors enabled VTE prediction with a concordance index of 0.882 and an AUC of 0.894. Conclusion: This article describes the construction and validation of a new nomogram for VTE prediction in LC patients, which has a predictive performance that is higher than any of the widely used conventional risk assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.