ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Staff perspectives on a novel pediatric developmental screening and referral program in a community health center.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are longstanding gaps in the surveillance, screening, and referral for developmental disorders among medically underserved children, which exacerbate existing health inequities. While innovative interventions to close these gaps are emerging, little is known about clinician and staff perspectives on implementing these novel screening and referral approaches for developmental disorders within safety net settings. This study examines safety net clinician and staff perspectives on implementing the Early Childhood Initiative, a project aimed at detecting developmental concerns early and facilitating timely intervention for children up to age five years within a large community health center-based pediatric practice in Connecticut. Initiative staff created clinic workflows within electronic health records to implement and track referral pathways, including outreach, education, and community connections, screening 8,095 children between September 2023 and August 2025. To better understand program implementation, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with the project team using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Overall, the project team was enthusiastic about the effectiveness of the Early Childhood Initiative but had concerns related to gaps in families served (Reach), training discrepancies (Implementation), staff turnover (Adoption), and sustainability (Maintenance). The Early Childhood Initiative offers a scalable strategy for early detection of and intervention for developmental disorders in safety net settings, potentially reaching families often left out of the process. However, implementation challenges suggest a need for further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.