ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Number-line estimation training in preschoolers supports early mathematical development and is associated with a stronger approximate-to-symbolic numerical pathway.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how children connect approximate nonsymbolic magnitudes with exact symbolic numbers is a central question in theories of numerical development. A major debate concerns the directionality of this relation: whether approximate magnitude representations scaffold the acquisition of symbolic number knowledge, as proposed by mapping accounts, or whether symbolic number learning refines approximate magnitude processing, as proposed by refinement accounts. This study examined whether number-line estimation training enhances preschoolers' number-line accuracy and early mathematical abilities, and whether it is associated with short-term developmental pathways between nonsymbolic and symbolic numerical systems. A total of 114 Swedish preschoolers participated in a pre-post intervention study, with an experimental group receiving three sessions of game-like computerized number-line estimation practice on a bounded 0-20 number line with trial-by-trial feedback. Results showed a large improvement in number-line accuracy and a modest but significant transfer effect to early mathematical abilities in the experimental group, whereas the control group showed no comparable gains in these intervention outcomes. Analyses of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical processing revealed two complementary predictive dynamics. Symbolic abilities predicted later nonsymbolic performance after controlling for baseline nonsymbolic performance and condition, consistent with the refinement account. Conversely, nonsymbolic abilities predicted later symbolic performance after controlling for baseline symbolic performance and condition, consistent with predictions from the mapping account. Importantly,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.