Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761011›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026

Beyond generic principles: a framework for the ethical analysis of artificial intelligence in organ transplantation.

Nadia Primc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nadia PrimcInstitute for the History and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly entering clinical medicine, and organ transplantation is no exception. While a growing body of literature addresses the ethical challenges of AI in healthcare, systematic analysis of the specific ethical dimensions of AI use in organ transplantation is missing. This gap reflects a genuine analytical challenge: the transplantation process is ethically complex in ways that general AI ethics frameworks do not adequately capture. Transplantation medicine simultaneously bears ethical obligations to deceased donors, living donors, donor families, organ recipients, and the public at large. These obligations shift substantially across the stages of the transplantation process, from the patient-centred ethics of donor identification and listing decisions, through the distributive justice logic governing organ allocation, to the professional responsibility questions of the peri- and post-transplant phases. A rigorous ethical analysis of AI in organ transplantation therefore requires, first, a systematic mapping of AI use cases and models onto the transplantation process; second, an identification of the stakeholder-specific ethical obligations pertinent at each stage; and third, an in-depth analysis of how those obligations are specifically affected by the properties of the AI system in question. This paper proposes this framework and illustrates it using the example of AI-assisted organ allocation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEthical AnalysisOrgan TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementHumansTissue Donorsartificial intelligencedistributive justiceethicsexplainabilityfairness

Identifiers

PMID42761011
PMCPMC13585697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.