Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42761009›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

An Early Single-Center Case Series Experience With a Recently Introduced Formulation of Inhaled Treprostinil (Yutrepia).

Christopher R Moore, Munish Sharma, Andrew I Kim, Shekhar Ghamande, Peter Yau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher R MoorePulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.
Munish SharmaPulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.
Andrew I KimPulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.
Shekhar GhamandePulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.
Peter YauPulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreprostinil inhalation powder produced using PRINT technology (LIQ861; delivered via the RS00 Model 8 dry powder inhaler; Yutrepia) is an FDA-approved inhaled treprostinil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Evidence from the INSPIRE phase 3 open-label study supported long-term safety and tolerability; however, real-world implementation data remain limited.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center observational case series of consecutive patients initiated on Yutrepia in routine clinical practice between June and December 2025. Our cohort included group 1, group 3, and mixed group 1 and 3 treated at our Pulmonary Hypertension Center of Excellence. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world safety and tolerability of Yutrepia, with particular attention to airway-related adverse events (AEs), dose modification, and treatment discontinuation in routine clinical practice. Secondary outcomes included initial and maintenance doses achieved. Additional AEs recorded include dizziness, headache, nausea, hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, fatigue, and hypoxemia. All data were calculated using a Wilson 95% confidence interval (CI) given the small sample size.

resultsTwenty-two patients were included (mean age: 66.4 ± 13.8 years; 16 (72.7%) female patients). PH etiology was group 1 in 13 of 22 patients (59.1%), group 3 in 3 of 22 (13.6%), and mixed group 1 and 3 in 6 of 22 (27.3%). Of the 22 patients, 17 (77.27%) were on background therapy: 11 of 13 patients (84.62%) in group 1, 1 of 3 patients (33.33%) in group 3, and 5 of 6 patients (83.33%) in mixed group 1 and 3. Airway-specific AEs were documented in 8 of 22 patients (36.4%; 95% CI: 19.7%-57.0%). Shortness of breath occurred in 5 of 22 (22.7%; 95% CI: 10.1%-43.4%), cough occurred in 3 of 22 (13.6%; 95% CI: 4.7%-33.3%), and no cases of throat irritation were documented (0.0%; 95% CI: 0.0%-14.9%). Dose modification due to any AE occurred in 9 of 22 patients (40.9%; 95% CI: 23.3%-61.3%), and no patients required dose modification or discontinuation because of airway-related AEs (0.0%; 95% CI: 0.0%-14.9%). Due to the retrospective design, causal attribution of individual events to Yutrepia could not always be established.

conclusionsIn this retrospective, single-center case series of Yutrepia, no airway-related dose modifications or discontinuations were documented; however, the 95% confidence interval (0.0%-14.9%) indicates that clinically relevant event rates cannot be excluded given the small sample size. Overall, however, 54.5% of patients experienced an adverse event, 40.9% required dose modification, and 36.4% discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. These findings should not be interpreted as indicating that Yutrepia was broadly well tolerated. The observed frequencies of airway-related adverse events were descriptively lower for some events than those reported in selected previous studies of inhaled treprostinil, but direct comparisons cannot be made because of differences in study populations, designs, follow-up, and adverse event ascertainment. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, these findings are hypothesis-generating, and larger prospective studies are needed to define persistence, tolerability, and longer-term clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

group 1 phgroup 3 phinhaled treprostinilpulmonary hypertensionpulmonary vascular diseaseyutrepia

Identifiers

PMID42761009
PMCPMC13585702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.