Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Digital twins and systemic acceleration: insights from Luhmann's sociological perspective.

Simon Plakolb, Raffael Hiden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon PlakolbCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Institute of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Raffael HidenDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital age has brought about many hypes about new technology of which digital twins are among the most recent. Techno-optimistic thought proclaims them to bring about a revolution in societal management. We interrogate Luhmann's sociology about the relationship between a social system and (its) digital twin(-s). In doing so we discover that common definitions of digital twins do not go beyond long-established technologies. If a digital twin is a computer model that is fed by information of the physical system which it influences in some feedback loop, to Luhmann every computer model is one. Yet, the term points to the apparent necessity to baptize an observable difference. We identify the latest and ongoing acceleration of integrated digital systems as this difference that makes a difference. This systemic acceleration, the maximization of the velocity of self-reference, builds the focal point in our discussion of looming changes. We think that digital twins encode a power relationship. Only if society remains in control of the modes of selection can a digital twin foster its second-order observation. To this end, the engineering derived notion of a direct cybernetic wire that connects the digital twin to the physical must be replaced with a mechanism for structural coupling. A social digital twin can then act as a digital mirror that enables an immediate, radicalized second-order observation. Thus, digital twins are in our understanding the epitome of the accelerative effect that digitalization has on society.

Indexed as

accelerationcomplexitycomplex systemsdigital twinLuhmannsocial systemssystem

Identifiers

PMID42760999
PMCPMC13585648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.