ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Digital twins and systemic acceleration: insights from Luhmann's sociological perspective.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digital age has brought about many hypes about new technology of which digital twins are among the most recent. Techno-optimistic thought proclaims them to bring about a revolution in societal management. We interrogate Luhmann's sociology about the relationship between a social system and (its) digital twin(-s). In doing so we discover that common definitions of digital twins do not go beyond long-established technologies. If a digital twin is a computer model that is fed by information of the physical system which it influences in some feedback loop, to Luhmann every computer model is one. Yet, the term points to the apparent necessity to baptize an observable difference. We identify the latest and ongoing acceleration of integrated digital systems as this difference that makes a difference. This systemic acceleration, the maximization of the velocity of self-reference, builds the focal point in our discussion of looming changes. We think that digital twins encode a power relationship. Only if society remains in control of the modes of selection can a digital twin foster its second-order observation. To this end, the engineering derived notion of a direct cybernetic wire that connects the digital twin to the physical must be replaced with a mechanism for structural coupling. A social digital twin can then act as a digital mirror that enables an immediate, radicalized second-order observation. Thus, digital twins are in our understanding the epitome of the accelerative effect that digitalization has on society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.