ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Healthcare providers' perspectives on headache care in Azerbaijan: results of a national cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Headache disorders are prevalent in Azerbaijan, yet data on system-level care delivery, treatment options, and provider preparedness remain scarce. Using a national, cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals, this study aimed to assess the current state of headache care in Azerbaijan. Methods: A national, cross-sectional survey was conducted using a convenience sampling approach, targeting healthcare professionals involved in headache management across Azerbaijan. Data were collected between December 2024 and May 2025, 333 healthcare professionals, including neurologists (25.9%), general practitioners (27.9%), pharmacists (21.9%), and pediatricians (24.3%). Data were collected using a modified HARDSHIP-based questionnaire that addressed provider training, access to medications, treatment practices, access to migraine-specific resources, and perceptions of patient demographics. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses were performed to describe regional and professional disparities. Results: All participating healthcare professionals reported receiving some form of training in headache care. Within the survey sample, respondents were predominantly based in urban hospital settings, whereas relatively few practiced in rural areas and none reported working in community-based healthcare centers. These findings suggest possible geographic differences in the distribution of participating healthcare professionals; however, because the survey was based on convenience sampling, they should be interpreted as descriptive observations rather than evidence of nationally representative workforce disparities. The most frequently reported acute treatments were NSAIDs (67.3%) and paracetamol (27.6%). The most commonly reported preventive medications were amitriptyline (75.7%), magnesium (51.1%), gabapentin (24.6%), and valproate (24.3%). Migraine-specific therapies such as triptans were reported infrequently (15.3%), whereas beta-blockers were not reported to be used for migraine prevention. Newer migraine-specific therapies, including anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, were not available within the national healthcare system at the time of data collection. Conclusion: This national provider-based survey provides the first perception-based overview of headache care in Azerbaijan and identifies priorities for future health-service planning. Although participating healthcare professionals reported exposure to headache-related training and access to commonly used medications, the findings suggest potential geographic differences in provider distribution and limited use of migraine-specific therapies. Because the survey was based on healthcare providers' perceptions derived from a convenience sample, the findings should be interpreted as complementary to, rather than substitutes for, patient-level or administrative health-system data. Future nationally representative studies are needed to guide the development of structured, evidence-based headache services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.