Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Glocalizing the theory of learning: a pluriversal perspective on health professions education.

Nabil Zary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nabil ZaryInstitute of Learning, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glocalization has emerged as the preferred solution in health professions education (HPE) to the tension between globally recognized standards and local training practices. Its structure, however, is hub-and-spoke: theory is developed at a Western center, adaptation handled at the periphery. Curricula, accreditation, and assessment are adapted locally; learning theories are treated as universal and unchanging. This Perspective contends that the glocalization project remains incomplete and suggests how to finish it: by glocalizing the very theory of learning. Drawing on bibliometric evidence of concentrated knowledge production and thirty years of educational practice across four continents, I propose a pluriversal extension that integrates Islamic, Hindu, Confucian, Buddhist, and Ubuntu traditions as active sources of learning theory rather than as cultural contexts for imported ideas. To keep engagement rigorous rather than romantic, I outline a five-level comparison framework (vocabulary, phenomenon, mechanism, prescription, ontology), state its provenance and limits, and demonstrate its operation in worked examples and a complete supplementary application. The paper closes with theoretical and practical implications for curriculum, assessment, research capacity, and artificial intelligence, as well as an agenda for validating the framework.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecurriculumdecolonialityglocalizationhealth professions educationlearning theorypluriversalityprofessional identity formation

Identifiers

PMID42760963
PMCPMC13585607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.