ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Generational safety profiles of BTK inhibitors: adverse reaction signals and real-world evidence from the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The development of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has revolutionized the management of B-cell malignancies and holds potential in autoimmune diseases. However, safety concerns remain regarding treatment-associated adverse events: first-generation ibrutinib has been associated with off-target adverse event profiles, second-generation agents (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) require further validation of long-term safety patterns, and the real-world safety characteristics of third-generation pirtobrutinib continue to be evaluated. This study aims to characterize differences in adverse event (AE) disproportionality reporting signal patterns among four BTK inhibitors using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: This study analyzed AE reports for four BTK inhibitors from the FAERS database via disproportionality analysis with four distinct algorithms, complemented by a clinical prioritization scoring system. Disproportionality reporting signal patterns were characterized across System Organ Class (SOC), Preferred Term (PT), and temporal distribution dimensions. A standardized 2-year observation window was applied for sensitivity analysis, and AE-mortality associations were evaluated. Results: A total of 77,014 AE reports were included in this study. The four BTK inhibitors showed positive disproportionality reporting signals in blood and lymphatic system disorders, cardiac disorders, and infections and infestations. However, distinct disproportionality signal patterns were observed at the PT level. Ibrutinib showed prominent cardiovascular-related disproportionality reporting signals, particularly for atrial fibrillation (ROR = 9.8). Acalabrutinib was characterized by a distinct headache signal. Zanubrutinib showed prominent signals for myelosuppression (ROR = 16.24) and haemorrhage subcutaneous (ROR = 146.81). Pirtobrutinib demonstrated the strongest signal for increased white blood cell count (ROR = 54.28). Descriptive analysis of reported time-to-onset distributions showed that pneumonia reports for ibrutinib represented a larger proportion among cases reported after longer treatment durations, whereas haemorrhage and decreased white blood cell count reports were more frequently observed within earlier reporting intervals. In terms of fatal outcomes, multiple PTs associated with ibrutinib showed statistically significant associations with reported death outcomes within the FAERS dataset. Conclusion: This descriptive pharmacovigilance study identified distinct disproportionality reporting signal patterns for four BTK inhibitors based on FAERS data, providing potential signals for post-marketing safety surveillance. These findings should be interpreted as differences in reporting patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.