ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Interpretable machine learning for multiclass trajectory prediction in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage: development and external validation.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome imposes a substantial global burden, yet most studies reduce stage change to a binary outcome that cannot distinguish clinically meaningful trajectories. This study developed and externally validated a multiclass machine learning framework for predicting CKM stage trajectories. Methods: A longitudinal cohort of 2,971 adults with baseline CKM stages 0-3 was used for development, with trajectories classified as Improvement, Stable, Mild Progression and Rapid Progression. Six algorithms were compared by Macro-AUC and decision curve analysis. SHAP values identified consensus predictors for a parsimonious model, externally validated in an independent hospital-based cohort (N = 291). Results: XGBoost achieved the highest Macro-AUC (0.786, 95% CI 0.757-0.813), with the six algorithms performing comparably. For rapid-progression screening, the primary model reached a sensitivity of 0.767, a specificity of 0.739 and a negative predictive value of 0.949 at a threshold of 0.23, and identified 41.9% of rapid progressors within the highest-risk 10%. Baseline CKM stage was the dominant prognostic determinant, with a stage-only benchmark reaching 0.689. Six consensus predictors were identified: baseline CKM stage, age, fasting glucose, TyG-BMI index, systolic blood pressure and triglycerides. The parsimonious model retained over 98% of full-model discrimination and reached a Macro-AUC of 0.752 externally without retraining. Conclusion: This framework distinguishes CKM trajectories and is intended for screening rapid progression rather than assigning individuals to a single trajectory. Baseline CKM stage is the principal prognostic determinant, and the six-predictor model preserves discrimination using routinely available measurements, supporting stratified follow-up pending confirmation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.