SynthesisComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Pathogenic Foodborne Bacteria in the Game Meat of Hunted Large Ungulates-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonotic bacterial pathogens are a major concern for food safety, yet information regarding their occurrence in game meat remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes available data on Salmonella spp., Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Listeria spp., Yersinia spp., and Campylobacter spp. in game meat from hunted wild ungulates. Relevant studies published between 2004 and 2024 were identified through structured database searches and screened using predefined criteria. Data on host species, diagnostic methods, prevalence estimates, isolate characterization, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) were extracted. Pooled prevalence estimates were determined, stratified by detection methods (culture-based and PCR-based) and animal groups (suids and ruminants). A total of 46 publications (170 studies; 223 prevalence estimates) were included. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across the studies. PCR-based methods yielded higher detection rates than culture, though the magnitude of the difference varied between pathogens. Pathogen occurrence was generally higher in meat from suids, except for STEC, which was more prevalent in the game meat of ruminants. Although many strains appeared to have lower pathogenic potential compared with those typically implicated in human disease, the presence of specific virulence-associated genes, serogroups, and sequence types linked to human infections indicates that game meat may act as a potential source of infection. AMR was reported in a limited number of studies. Overall, this review highlights substantial methodological variability and important data gaps, particularly regarding virulence-associated genes, genomic characterization, and AMR. More comprehensive studies spanning a broader range of ecological and production contexts are needed to strengthen the evidence base for the microbiological safety of game meat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.