ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2026
Cinematic Rendering of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Photorealistic Visualization of Normal Neuroanatomy and Primary Brain Tumors.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCinematic rendering (CR) is an advanced post-processing technique that generates volumetric 3-dimensional (3D) visualizations from routine clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, potentially enhancing anatomical interpretation and spatial understanding.
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 3.0-T MRI datasets from 35 participants (15 healthy controls and 20 patients with histopathologically confirmed primary brain tumors) were analyzed. Cinematic rendering images were generated from precontrast 3D T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequences. Two independent senior observers evaluated image resolution, anatomical detail, lesion depiction, visualization utility, and educational value using a 3-point Likert-type scale. Interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratic weighted Cohen's κ with bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsCinematic rendering provided consistent, high-fidelity 3D visualization of normal neuroanatomy and tumor-related structural alterations across different primary brain tumor histologies. Image quality ratings were uniformly high (median score: 3), with no significant differences between groups (P ≥ .229). Educational value was rated consistently by both observers across all cases. Interobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.65-1.00), with perfect agreement for lesion depiction (κ = 1.00; 100% agreement).
conclusionCinematic rendering applied to routine brain MRI provides reproducible, depth-enhanced 3D visualization of normal brain anatomy and tumor-related spatial relationships. The technique demonstrates consistent image quality and interpretability across different tumor types and may serve as a supplementary tool for neuroanatomical education and spatial understanding in clinical practice. Cite this article as: Fırat Z, Er F, Ieva AD, Ekinci G, Türe U. Cinematic rendering of brain magnetic resonance imaging: photorealistic visualization of normal neuroanatomy and primary brain tumors. Eurasian J Med. 2026, 58(4), 1605, doi: 10.5152/ eurasianjmed.2026.261605.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.