Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760625›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Dual acellular subnormothermic machine perfusion for enhanced uterus preservation in a swine model.

Lucile Cabanel, Haïzam Oubari, Bradley W Ellis, Ludivine Dion, Vincent Lavoué, Carla Sousa, Loïc Van Dieren, Olivier Morel, Mark A Randolph, Curtis L Cetrulo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lucile CabanelCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-5332
Haïzam OubariCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-3707
Bradley W EllisCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ludivine DionDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Rennes, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-5756
Vincent LavouéDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Rennes, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4682-2806
Carla SousaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Rennes, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9081-7959
Loïc Van DierenCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Olivier MorelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Nancy, University of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Mark A RandolphShriners Children's Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curtis L CetruloShriners Children's Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-3894
Korkut UygunCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexandre G LellouchCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-8662
Yanis BerkaneCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-5132
Basak E UygunCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-7900

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK043351 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Ramnik J Xavier · 1991 to 2026
$35.3M
P&F programP30DK135043 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Dennis Brown · 2023 to 2026
$5.4M
Development of engineered fasciocutaneous skin flapsR01AR082825 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Basak Elif Uygun · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Development of Capillary-on-Chip for the Study of Preservation Injury on Microvascular Endothelial CellsF32HL176334 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Bradley Wayne Ellis · 2024 to 2026
$242k
Boston Area Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center (BADERC) DK135043Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Grant DK043351CHU de RennesFondation des Gueules CasséesNational Science Foundation ECC-1941543NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL176334NHLBI NIH HHS F32HL176334NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR082825NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR082825NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK043351NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK135043Shriners Children's 84308Société Française de Chirurgie Plastique, Reconstructrice et Esthétique (SOFCPRE, France)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMachine perfusion has rapidly developed in the last decade and demonstrated improved preservation of conventional and marginal organs by reducing ischemia and hypoxia injuries. The aim of this study was to assess whether subnormothermic machine perfusion improves graft preservation compared with SCS in a porcine uterus model. MATERIAL AND

methodsSwine uteri were procured from circulatory-dead donors and allocated into two groups. In the experimental group, the organs were preserved with 4 h-dual subnormothermic machine perfusion (n = 4) while the control group (n = 4) underwent 4 h-static cold storage. After preservation, all uteri received ex vivo whole blood normothermic reperfusion (NMP) to simulate transplantation. Perfusate samples were analyzed from uterine arteries and veins every 30 min for gas and metabolic analysis, and weight variations were recorded continuously during perfusion. Following simulated transplantation, uterine contraction was assessed after oxytocin injection, and macrovascular perfusion was evaluated using contrast angiography. Several biopsies were procured from different parts of the uterus for histological and immunohistochemistry analysis.

resultsIn the experimental group, the weight of the uteri and lactate difference between vein and artery decreased during subnormothermic machine perfusion. Weight gain was significantly higher in the control group (p = 0.03), which was consistent with interstitial edema observed on histological sections in this group. Uterine contraction evaluated through semi-quantitative scoring was higher in the experimental group (p = 0.02).

conclusionsIn this porcine model, subnormothermic machine perfusion reduces edema and preserves contractility more effectively than static cold storage. We demonstrate its particular interest in recovering organs procured from deceased donors. In addition, subnormothermic machine perfusion may enable other applications, including graft assessment, treatment and tolerance induction.

Indexed as

machine perfusionorgan preservationstatic cold storageuterus transplantationvascularized composite allotransplantationVCA

Identifiers

PMID42760625
PMCPMC13589109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.