ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Microaneurysm segmentation in early diabetic retinopathy: a localized patch-based U-Net approach to overcome microscopic lesion oversight.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision impairment and a major long-term microvascular complication of diabetes. Early detection and prevention of diabetes-related complications through advanced imaging and software-assisted patient management remain important clinical priorities. Microaneurysms (MAs) are the earliest and most subtle indicators of DR, but their small size and low contrast often lead to missed detection during manual fundus examination, delaying intervention. Automated MA segmentation is therefore essential for large-scale DR screening.
methodsWe conducted a controlled empirical evaluation of localized patch-based training for microaneurysm (MA) segmentation, benchmarking a compact, imbalance-aware U-Net model including learnable transposed-convolution up-sampling against a full-image U-Net trained on identical data. Fundus images and corresponding MA masks were divided into non-overlapping 256 × 256 patches, increasing MA pixel density per training sample by approximately 60-fold relative to full-image input thereby directly targeting the extreme class imbalance that causes full-image models to collapse to all-background predictions. The model was trained and evaluated on the publicly available IDRiD [Indian Diabetic Retinopathy Image Dataset] and DDR [Dataset for Diabetic Retinopathy] datasets. Performance was assessed using Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice coefficient, accuracy, recall, and precision.
resultsPerformance was evaluated on a representative held-out subset of 100 images selected from an independent pool of 514 MA-annotated test images spanning the IDRiD and DDR datasets. The patch-based model achieved an overall pixel-level accuracy of 99.89%, a Dice coefficient of 76.9%, IoU of 63.2%, recall (sensitivity) of 69.1% and precision of 88.7%, while the full-image U-Net trained on the same data failed to recover any MA pixels (IoU = 0, Dice = 0) despite comparable pixel accuracy thereby demonstrating that overlap-based metrics, not accuracy, are the decisive criterion for this task. Per-image lesion-coverage analysis showed a mean match rate of approximately 60% of annotated MA contours, providing a clinically interpretable read-out beyond pixel overlap.
conclusionThis controlled empirical evaluation demonstrates that localized patch-based training is an effective and computationally efficient strategy for overcoming the extreme class imbalance that causes conventional full-image U-Nets to systematically miss microaneurysms. The proposed patch-based U-Net showed promising microaneurysm segmentation performance on a held-out subset of IDRiD and DDR images; further evaluation on the additional datasets and independent external cohorts can aid in the clinical screening utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.