ArticleBMC medical education2026
AI literacy and ethical attitudes toward AI in medical students: evidence from a structural model.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has raised ethical concerns regarding autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, accountability, and human oversight. While AI literacy is increasingly being adopted as a fundamental competency area in medical education, there is limited empirical evidence regarding its relationship with ethical attitudes toward AI. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between AI literacy and ethical attitudes toward AI among medical students and to explore how AI literacy is associated with ethical preparedness.
methodsThis cross-sectional correlation study was conducted with 461 medical students at a state university. Data was collected using a Demographic Information Form, AI-Literacy Scale, and AI-Ethics Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, simple linear regression, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were used to analyze relationships and associations between variables.
resultsA significant positive correlation was found between AI literacy and ethical attitudes toward AI (r = 0.648, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that AI literacy was significantly associated with ethical attitudes and explained 42% of the variance (R² = 0.420). Structural model analysis confirmed a strong positive path effect (β = 0.655, p < 0.001; R² = 0.430; f² = 0.753). Students who received formal AI training achieved significantly higher scores in AI literacy and ethical attitudes, while no significant differences were observed between AI usage frequency and academic year. Although AI literacy did not differ by gender, female students reported higher ethical attitude scores.
conclusionsAI literacy was significantly associated with medical students' ethical attitudes toward AI. No significant association was observed between frequency of AI use and ethical preparedness in the current study. These findings suggest that AI literacy should be conceptualized not only as a technical skill but as an important component associated with ethical preparedness in AI-enabled healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.