ArticleBMC nursing2026
The impact of the second victim phenomenon on nurse turnover intentions and absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Second Victim Phenomenon (SVP) is the psychological trauma that healthcare workers experience due to their negative experiences with patients. Its incidence in nurses is well known, but its quantitative implications on nurse retention and attendance are poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the evidence regarding the relationship between SVP and nurse turnover intentions and absenteeism.
methodsA systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases was conducted through April 2026, following PRISMA guidelines. The included studies were cross-sectional studies that investigated the relationship between SVP and turnover intentions or absenteeism among nurses. Two independent reviewers used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to screen, extract data, and evaluate the quality. Random-effects models were used to pool effect sizes in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was measured using both the I
resultsA total of 38 cross-sectional studies were included, comprising 22,241 participants in the turnover intention analysis and 14,662 participants in the absenteeism analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that nurses experiencing SVP had significantly higher odds of turnover intention (pooled OR = 2.99, 95% CI: 2.81-3.18, p < 0.001, I² = 75.9%) and increased risk of absenteeism (pooled RR = 2.21, 95% CI: 2.05-2.37, p < 0.001, I² = 82.6%). There was significant study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed that the effects were similar in varied geographic areas and health care settings. There was no significant publication bias (Egger test p > 0.05 in both results). GRADE evaluation showed low-quality evidence due to the observational study design and heterogeneity, but upgraded the effect size to large.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides strong evidence that SVP is significantly associated with higher turnover intention and absenteeism among nurses, posing a serious risk to the stability of the health care workforce. The results highlight the importance of organizational interventions to support nurses with SVP, such as peer support programs, psychological counseling, and changes in institutional culture. Future studies need to use longitudinal designs to examine temporal relationships and intervention studies to assess the effectiveness of support programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.