ArticleBMC nursing2026
Job satisfaction among Saudi and Non-Saudi critical care and emergency nurses: associations with psychological distress, turnover intention, and perceived retention strategies.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritical care and emergency nurses work in complex and demanding environments that may affect their occupational well-being, psychological health, and job satisfaction. Although previous studies have examined nurse retention challenges, limited evidence exists regarding factors associated with job satisfaction among Saudi and non-Saudi nurses working in high-acuity clinical settings in Saudi Arabia. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess job satisfaction, psychological distress, turnover intention, and perceived organizational retention strategies among critical care and emergency nurses in Saudi Arabia and to identify factors statistically associated with higher job satisfaction.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional correlational study was conducted among 494 critical care and emergency nurses recruited through convenience sampling from hospitals across five cities in northwestern Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using the McCloskey/Mueller Satisfaction Scale, Turnover Intention Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2, and a structured retention strategy questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.
resultsOverall, 57.9% of nurses reported moderate job satisfaction and 51.8% reported moderate turnover intention. Non-Saudi nurses reported higher perceived job distress and turnover intention compared with Saudi nurses. Job satisfaction was negatively associated with turnover intention (r = - 0.435, p = 0.021). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that salary ≥ 10,000 Saudi Riyals (OR = 2.68), employment in governmental hospitals (OR = 3.14), working in emergency departments (OR = 1.92), lower perceived job distress (OR = 2.62), absence of anxiety symptoms (OR = 2.47), lower back pain severity (OR = 1.86), and absence of depressive symptoms (OR = 1.58) were statistically associated with higher job satisfaction.
conclusionJob satisfaction among critical care and emergency nurses was associated with workplace characteristics, physical health status, and psychological well-being. Although turnover intention was inversely correlated with job satisfaction, the cross-sectional design limits interpretation of temporal relationships. Organizational strategies focusing on supportive work environments, psychological well-being, equitable employment conditions, and professional development may contribute to improved nurse satisfaction and workforce stability. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.