ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Why Do Male Users Engage with Connected Sex Toys? A Latent Class Analysis of Motivational Profiles.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teledildonics are internet-connected sex toys enabling remote and interactive sexual experiences. Despite growing adoption, factors driving engagement with teledildonics remain underexplored. Clarifying how user motivations intersect to form distinct profiles is crucial for advancing theoretical models of sexual behavior and technology adoption. This study draws on a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data from customers of one teledildonics company. Using latent class analysis, we identified motivational patterns among male users (N = 569) across five indicators (arousal enhancement, relaxation, sexual satisfaction in a partner's absence, boredom relief, and technology integration) and examined associations between latent class membership and sociodemographics (e.g., age, sexual orientation, relationship status), usage modalities (i.e., frequency, concurrent pornography use, sex toy type), and sexual satisfaction. A four-class solution best fit the data. Solo Comfort Seekers (Class 1, 38.2%) strongly endorsed partner-substitution motives and were characterized by regular pairing with pornography. Low-Regulation Users (Class 2, 30.3%) showed the weakest endorsement of relaxation and boredom relief. Standalone Toy Users (Class 3, 22.6%) showed the lowest endorsement of technological integration and favored manual devices. Tech-Integrated Regulators (Class 4, 8.9%) moderately to strongly endorsed all motives and almost always used teledildonics with pornography. This study shows that teledildonics practices are embedded in complex individual and relational contexts, shaped by more than the pursuit of sexual pleasure. Recognizing these diverse profiles can inform theory, guide inclusive device design, and support tailored health promotion that advances sexual well-being and responds to evolving forms of intimacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42760476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.