ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Physicians' Beliefs About Treating Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure Readings Among Hospitalized Patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there is no high-quality evidence guiding the treatment of asymptomatic elevated BP readings in hospitalized patients.
objectiveWe conducted a nationwide survey of hospitalists to identify their preferences for treating patients with asymptomatic elevated BP readings.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey was conducted at five institutions in 2024. The questions, written by the research team, asked about physicians' approach and preferences for intensifying antihypertensive medications for inpatients with asymptomatic elevated BP. We defined "elevated BP" as ≥ 140/90 mmHg and < 210/120 mmHg. We performed a descriptive analysis of the responses and compared responses across sites.
resultsWe received 166 responses (response rate ranged from 24 to 64% across five hospitals). There was variation in the importance of treating asymptomatically elevated BP with 27% (n = 45) agreeing it important and 47% disagreeing. This response was similar across all sites. The median threshold for intensification was 170-179 mmHg. Most physicians reported that they would be more likely to treat patients with a history of heart failure (73%), stroke (73%), myocardial infarction (64%), or coronary disease (57%). Physicians reported strong agreement that they "prefer not to be contacted by nurses about an asymptomatic systolic BP reading < 170 mmHg" and agreed that "treatment is driven by nurses calling physicians."
conclusionAlmost half of the physicians believed that in the hospital setting, asymptomatic elevated BP should not be routinely treated.
Identifiers
42760462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.