Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760457›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Large Language Models for Ankle Fracture Classification and Management Prediction from Routine Clinical Documentation: A Single-Center Exploratory Study.

Benjamin Schwarberg, Conrad Ketzer, Bosse Thiel, Andreas Sauter, Marcus R Makowski, Daniel Spitzl, Markus Mergen, Florian T Gassert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin SchwarbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany. Benjamin-Schwarberg@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7753-2784
Conrad KetzerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Bosse ThielDepartment of Trauma Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Andreas SauterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Daniel SpitzlDepartment of Gastroenterology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Markus Mergen *Department of Gastroenterology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Florian T Gassert *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries in trauma surgery and require accurate classification, consistent documentation, and individualized management. Large language models (LLMs) offer the potential to translate unstructured clinical text reports into structured, management-related information, yet their role in orthopedic trauma workflows remains insufficiently defined. In this retrospective study, the performance of Llama 3.1 (70B Instruct) was evaluated using routine radiology reports and clinical documentation from 54 patients with acute ankle fractures. Outputs were compared with reference standards derived from routine clinical documentation for Weber fracture classification, operative versus nonoperative management, and surgical procedure category. Four prompting strategies were systematically assessed. Accuracy for Weber classification ranged from 0.759 to 0.815, well above majority-class baseline (0.556), with strong performance for Weber B fractures and most errors occurring between adjacent categories. Macro-averaged F1 across the three Weber classes ranged from 0.744 to 0.822. Operative management prediction reached accuracies of 0.833 to 0.963 (sensitivity 0.872 to 1.000, specificity 0.571 to 0.714). Procedure category prediction demonstrated lower accuracy (0.426 to 0.610 depending on the endpoint), largely at or below a majority-class baseline (0.553), reflecting the limitations of text-only input for operative planning. These findings suggest that LLMs can extract structured information from routine clinical documentation, performing well for standardized classification but less reliably for procedure-level prediction. Prospective and multimodal validation is needed before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Ankle fractureLarge language modelManagement predictionTrauma surgeryWeber classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.