Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760453›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Comprehensive Stability Assessment of Squalene in a Nanoemulsion Adjuvant and the SpiN-Tec Vaccine: HPLC Quantification, Stress Testing, and Stability Studies.

Isabela Pereira Gomes, Graziella Gomes Rivelli, Flávia Fonseca Bagno, Natália Satchiko Hojo-Souza, Ana Luiza Chaves Maia, Liliane Martins Dos Santos, Bruna Rodrigues Dias Assis, Natália Salazar de Castro, Wellington Miranda Vargas, Rafael Rodrigues de Barros and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Isabela Pereira GomesCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-036X
Graziella Gomes RivelliCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-7154
Flávia Fonseca BagnoCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-6678
Natália Satchiko Hojo-SouzaCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3308-5149
Ana Luiza Chaves MaiaCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-7936
Liliane Martins Dos SantosCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4466-8868
Bruna Rodrigues Dias AssisCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4043-3612
Natália Salazar de CastroCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-3723
Wellington Miranda VargasCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8708-5087
Rafael Rodrigues de BarrosCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9934-4506
Natália Andrade de FreitasCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6269-0713
Gisele Assis Castro GoulartCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0292-076X
Renan Pedra de SouzaCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-4432
Santuza Maria Ribeiro TeixeiraCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2588-2842
Ana Paula FernandesCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6208-548X
Ricardo Tostes GazzinelliCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2427-7699
Eduardo Burgarelli LagesCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. eduardoburgarelli@ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2458-6021

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403514/2020-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403701/2020-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465293/2014-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03608-17Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/05527-0Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 01.20.0005.00Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 01.20.0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squalene-based nanoemulsions are widely used as adjuvants in vaccine formulations, but their stability can be affected by environmental factors such as pH, oxidative stress, temperature, and light. We have produced a squalene nanoemulsion (CTVad1) to support the clinical development of new vaccines. This study aimed to develop and validate an HPLC method for squalene quantification in SpiN-Tec, a recombinant protein vaccine against COVID-19. We also aimed to evaluate the stability of the CTVad1 adjuvant and SpiN-Tec under controlled storage conditions. A reversed-phase HPLC method was developed and validated, and comprehensive forced degradation studies were performed on the raw material and SpiN-Tec under acidic, basic, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic conditions to demonstrate the stability-indicating capability of the method. Physicochemical, morphological, and biological characteristics were assessed, and stability studies of both the vaccine and the CTVad1 adjuvant were performed under accelerated and long-term conditions. The HPLC method was selective, precise, accurate, linear, and robust. Squalene raw material degraded under all tested conditions, whereas formulation in nano-sized globules improved its stability, with degradation observed only under hydrogen peroxide and light exposure. CTVad1 remained stable over time, exhibiting only minor, non-critical changes within the specification limits in both accelerated and long-term stability studies, regardless of the glass packaging used (clear or amber). In addition, the SpiN-Tec vaccine maintained its physicochemical and biological integrity under all tested conditions, with all evaluated parameters remaining within the established specification ranges. Our findings demonstrate that proper formulation, packaging, and storage conditions can preserve squalene stability in nanoemulsion-based vaccines, ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of the SpiN-Tec vaccine and its adjuvant throughout shelf life.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicCOVID-19 VaccinesNanoparticlesSqualeneChemistry, PharmaceuticalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug StabilityEmulsionsAdjuvants, ImmunologicCOVID-19 VaccinesEmulsionsSqualeneforced degradation studiesHPLC method validationpharmaceutical stabilitystability-indicating methodvaccine adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID42760453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.