ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Intracranial venous thrombosis imaging by anatomical location: an educational review with mimics and diagnostic pitfalls.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial venous thrombosis encompasses diverse etiologies with clinical presentations ranging from an incidental finding to coma and death. Despite potentially devastating consequences, venous thrombosis is frequently overlooked by radiologists due to its predominantly extraaxial location close to the skull and clinical emphasis on arterial imaging evaluation in acute stroke management. This educational review addresses common and uncommon presentations across all anatomical locations of intracranial venous thrombosis, providing practical pearls and pitfalls for diagnostic interpretation. We review the imaging modalities CT and MRI, together with their venographic techniques, correlating imaging findings with anatomical location, thrombus age and signal evolution, complications, and underlying causes. Critical interpretive pitfalls are highlighted with strategies to avoid misdiagnosis. The review also emphasizes the important yet underrecognized association between intracranial pressure disorders and venous thrombosis, providing radiologists with a practical framework for improved diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: Question How can radiologists systematically recognize intracranial venous thrombosis across all anatomical locations and avoid the diagnostic pitfalls that lead to clinically significant missed diagnoses? Findings Location-specific imaging patterns, thrombus signal evolution, and recognition of common mimics such as arachnoid granulations enable accurate detection using combined non-contrast and venographic sequences. Critical relevance statement By organizing intracranial venous thrombosis imaging anatomically and pairing each location with its specific mimics and pitfalls, this review equips radiologists with a practical framework to improve detection accuracy and prevent clinically significant missed diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.