ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Current status and future directions of AI in prostate cancer detection on MRI: a special report from the ESUR prostate MRI working group authors.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group assesses the current role of artificial intelligence (AI) in MRI-based detection of prostate cancer. While deep learning tools demonstrate high technical accuracy, the report emphasizes a significant gap between research achievements and actual clinical application. Key statements include promoting a "human-in-the-loop" approach, where AI supports rather than replaces radiological expertise, to reduce risks such as automation bias and legal liability. There is an urgent need for prospective validation across multiple vendors and for implementing post-market surveillance to monitor algorithmic drift. Finally, the group identified research priorities focused on cost-effectiveness, transparency via explainable AI, and addressing the unique challenges of deploying these tools in population-based screening programs. KEY POINTS: Question What challenges hinder the clinical adoption of AI-based medical devices for prostate cancer detection? Findings Major obstacles include insufficient real-world validation, complex dynamics of human-AI interactions that require a human-in-the-loop approach, and the need for ongoing post-market surveillance for oncologic safety. Clinical relevance This report highlights the gap between AI's research promise and clinical readiness. It underscores the need for localvalidation, post-market surveillance, and adequate user training as AI tools become incorporated into diagnostic prostate MRI workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42760428What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.