Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760428›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Current status and future directions of AI in prostate cancer detection on MRI: a special report from the ESUR prostate MRI working group authors.

Renato Cuocolo, Andrea Ponsiglione, Georgios Agrotis, Tristan Barrett, Giorgio Brembilla, Iztok Caglic, Hanna Falińska, Charlie Alexander Hamm, Emanuele Messina, Tobias Penzkofer and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Renato CuocoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.
Andrea PonsiglioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Georgios AgrotisDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tristan BarrettDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Giorgio BrembillaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Iztok CaglicDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hanna FalińskaMilitary Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Charlie Alexander HammDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Emanuele MessinaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Tobias PenzkoferDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Raphaële Renard-PennaDepartment of Imagery, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Olivier RouvièreDepartment of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Luca RussoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Evis SalaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Johannes UhligDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Anwar R PadhaniPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Maarten de RooijDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. maarten.derooij@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-7907
ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group assesses the current role of artificial intelligence (AI) in MRI-based detection of prostate cancer. While deep learning tools demonstrate high technical accuracy, the report emphasizes a significant gap between research achievements and actual clinical application. Key statements include promoting a "human-in-the-loop" approach, where AI supports rather than replaces radiological expertise, to reduce risks such as automation bias and legal liability. There is an urgent need for prospective validation across multiple vendors and for implementing post-market surveillance to monitor algorithmic drift. Finally, the group identified research priorities focused on cost-effectiveness, transparency via explainable AI, and addressing the unique challenges of deploying these tools in population-based screening programs. KEY POINTS: Question What challenges hinder the clinical adoption of AI-based medical devices for prostate cancer detection? Findings Major obstacles include insufficient real-world validation, complex dynamics of human-AI interactions that require a human-in-the-loop approach, and the need for ongoing post-market surveillance for oncologic safety. Clinical relevance This report highlights the gap between AI's research promise and clinical readiness. It underscores the need for localvalidation, post-market surveillance, and adequate user training as AI tools become incorporated into diagnostic prostate MRI workflows.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasmsWorkflow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.