Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760365›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Integration of geriatric nutritional risk index and sarcopenia for prognostic assessment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a large-scale long-term retrospective study.

Wei-Qiong Ni, Fei Xu, Yu-Ling Zhang, Yong-Miao Lin, Xin Huang, Wen Xia, Nan-Jun Chen, Qin-Wen Du, Chen Ren, Sha-Sha Du and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wei-Qiong Ni *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Fei Xu *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Ling Zhang *Department of Endocrinology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Yong-Miao LinSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Xin HuangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Wen XiaSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Nan-Jun ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qin-Wen DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen Ren *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. renchen@smu.edu.cn.
Sha-Sha Du *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. duss0202@163.com.
Xin Hua *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. huaxin@gdph.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7967-7975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a heterogeneous malignancy with significant variability in survival outcomes among patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), even within the same disease stage. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel prognostic model integrating the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and sarcopenia to predict overall survival (OS) in NPC patients undergoing CCRT.

methodsWe conducted a large-scale, long-term retrospective analysis of 862 NPC patients treated with CCRT. Pretreatment GNRI and sarcopenia status were assessed, and patients were stratified into cachexia risk groups based on these two factors. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified independent prognostic predictors, which were incorporated into a nomogram for individualized OS prediction.

resultsPatients classified as high cachexia risk (low GNRI or presence of sarcopenia) exhibited significantly poorer OS compared to the low cachexia risk group (HR = 0.607, 95% CI: 0.428-0.861, P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that age > 45 years, advanced T stage, nodal involvement, and high cachexia risk independently predicted worse OS. The nomogram demonstrated favorable discrimination (C-index = 0.715, 95% CI: 0.643-0.787) compared to the traditional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (C-index = 0.639, 95% CI: 0.574-0.704).

conclusionsA prognostic model combining GNRI, sarcopenia, and clinicopathological factors effectively stratifies risk in NPC patients receiving CCRT. This integrated approach improves upon conventional staging in predicting OS and supports incorporating comprehensive nutritional and body composition assessments into routine clinical practice to guide personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Concurrent chemoradiotherapyGeriatric nutritional risk indexNasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognosisSarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.