ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Several multiple sequence alignment-perturbing methods enhance AlphaFold3 sampling of alternative protein states.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein function often involves multiple conformational states. Several multiple sequence alignment-perturbing strategies, including stochastic subsampling, clustering, and column masking, have been shown to enhance AlphaFold2 (AF2) sampling of alternative protein states. Here, we evaluate these strategies on AlphaFold3 (AF3) and compare their performance with the BioEmu Boltzmann sampling model on 107 proteins with multiple experimentally solved conformational states. We find that unperturbed AF3 samples alternative states with significantly higher TM-scores compared to AF2 and comparable to BioEmu. In particular, all MSA perturbation methods improve AF3 sampling at a statistically significant level, improving the top 1% TM-score by at least 0.05 in approximately 20% of cases each, while rarely worsening the performance. Furthermore, we find that different choices of amino acid masks can improve column-masked AF3 sampling for specific targets. Our results highlight how MSA perturbations remain relevant in AF3, providing a useful tool for understanding dynamic biological processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.