Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760288›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A Dataset of Temporally Consistent Instance Annotations for 4D Plant Phenotyping.

Jonas Bömer, Elias Marks, Facundo Ramón Ispizua Yamati, Cyrill Stachniss, Stefan Paulus, Anne-Katrin Mahlein

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas BömerInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany. boemer@ifz-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0723-4224
Elias MarksCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Facundo Ramón Ispizua YamatiInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Cyrill StachnissCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan PaulusInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Anne-Katrin MahleinInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 28DK108C20Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2070 - 390732324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatio-temporal 4D plant phenotyping requires high-quality datasets with precise and temporally consistent annotations. However, such datasets are currently limited due to the substantial effort required for data acquisition and manual annotation. To address this limitation, we present Sugar4D, a publicly available 4D plant phenotyping dataset of sugar beet acquired using a terrestrial LiDAR scanner. The dataset comprises 768 point clouds from 48 individual plants representing twelve genotypes, recorded semiweekly across 16 consecutive time points during the growing season. All point clouds are provided with temporally consistent, pointwise instance annotations at the organ level, enabling the tracking of individual leaves over time. Sugar4D includes 6778 annotated leaves corresponding to 675 unique leaf instances. In addition to the annotated point cloud data, we provide 58 plant- and five leaf-related morphological parameters for each plant and leaf at each time point, validated using a 3D-printed plant reference model and invasive manual reference measurements. Sugar4D supports the development and evaluation of methods for plant instance segmentation, temporal registration, organ tracking, and spatio-temporal morphological analysis.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisPhenotypePlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID42760288
PMCPMC13588776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.