ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026
Leveraging time-series electronic health records with large language models for chronic kidney disease diagnosis in primary care.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a growing public health challenge in China, exacerbated by low patient awareness and limited nephrology resources. This study evaluated the potential of large language models (LLMs) to support CKD diagnosis in primary care using time-series electronic health record (EHR) data.
methodsLongitudinal data were extracted from the EHR system of Weinan, China. Among 29 963 adults meeting inclusion criteria, 2300 participants were randomly sampled to generate clinical vignettes. CKD status was determined using diagnosis data, and individuals with early kidney injury indicated by laboratory abnormalities who lack a formal diagnosis were also identified. Using the DeepSeek LLM with prompt engineering, we generated binary CKD diagnoses and probability scores based on EHR data. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and the detection rate for early kidney injury and compared with traditional machine learning (ML) models.
resultsUsing 1-month EHR data, the LLM achieved an accuracy of 87.0%, AUC of 0.921, F1 score of 0.579, sensitivity of 89.1%, specificity of 86.8%, and detection rate for early kidney injury of 42.2%. With 1-year data, sensitivity increased to 92.2% and early detection to 52.6%. DISCUSSION: The LLM outperformed ML models across most metrics, achieving diagnostic performance comparable to clinicians and further enhancing detection for early kidney injury.
conclusionsLLMs applied to time-series EHR data may serve as a clinical decision support tool to improve CKD diagnosis in primary care, with particular value in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.