ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the central aspects of pain in the knee in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis is the most common joint disease worldwide and the leading cause of disability related to joint conditions. There are few relevant musculoskeletal pain measures adapted to Brazilian Portuguese, and the Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee) is not yet available in this language version.
objectiveTo cross-culturally adapt and evaluate the measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version (Br) of the CAP-Knee.
methodsThis was a methodological study with two phases: (1) the CAP-Knee was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Brazilian Portuguese; (2) measurement properties were tested. Patients with knee osteoarthritis (n = 130) completed the CAP-Knee-Br, as well as pain and central sensitization measures. Structural validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Furthermore, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, percentage of standard error of measurement error, floor and ceiling effects, McDonald's omega (internal consistency), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (test-retest reliability) were calculated.
resultsThe CAP-Knee-Br showed cross-cultural equivalence with the original version. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis replicated the original one-dimensional structure with 8 items. We found positive correlations between the CAP-Knee-Br with pain and central sensitization measures. The standard error of measurement, the minimal detectable change, and the percentage of the standard error of measurement were all good. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The CAP-Knee showed good reliability with adequate internal consistency (0.76 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.82]) and good test-retest stability (0.89 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.94]).
conclusionThe CAP-Knee-Br proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the central aspects of pain in Brazilian individuals with knee osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.