ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2026
Bedside predictors of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in children with suspected infection undergoing cardiac ultrasound.
Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction in children with suspected infection can worsen outcomes and complicate early management of sepsis. Cardiac ultrasound enables bedside assessment of ventricular function, but it remains unclear which bedside markers are associated with an increased risk of myocardial dysfunction.
objectiveTo identify which bedside markers commonly incorporated into pediatric sepsis assessment are associated with reduced left ventricular systolic function on cardiac ultrasound in children with suspected infection.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged 1 month to 21 years with suspected infection who had documented heart rate and blood pressure within 6 h of emergency department presentation and underwent cardiac ultrasound assessment (CUS), defined as either cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), within 24 h (N = 2046). Patients whose CUS was performed after initiation of vasoactive therapy were excluded. Reduced left ventricular systolic function was defined as either qualitative assessment of reduced function on expert reviewed cardiac POCUS or a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% on TTE. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed associations between bedside markers included in commonly used pediatric sepsis assessment tools (tachycardia, systolic hypotension, altered mental status, capillary refill time [CRT], and a high risk condition) and reduced left ventricular systolic function. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
resultsAmong 2046 eligible patients undergoing CUS, 89 (4.3%) had reduced left ventricular systolic function. In multivariable analysis, systolic hypotension (aOR 2.16, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.65) and prolonged capillary refill time (CRT 3 s, aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.28; CRT ≥4 s, aOR 2.22, 95% CI 0.98 to 5.03) were associated with reduced left ventricular systolic function. Tachycardia (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.26), altered mental status (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.21), and a high risk condition (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.05) were not associated with reduced function.
conclusionsReduced left ventricular systolic function on cardiac ultrasound among children with suspected infection was uncommon but associated with systolic hypotension and prolonged capillary refill time. Notably, it was not associated with tachycardia alone. These findings suggest that systolic hypotension and prolonged capillary refill are bedside markers associated with an increased risk of myocardial dysfunction and may help inform the selective use of cardiac ultrasound during the early evaluation of children with suspected infection. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.