ArticleScience advances2026
Geometry-controlled instability pathway selection in elastic helices enables fast, efficient robotic locomotion.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical instabilities can convert slow actuation into rapid, amplified motion, but predicting whether a three-dimensional elastic structure buckles smoothly or snaps remains challenging. Here, we show that helix geometry and boundary loading jointly select continuous buckling or snap-through in elastic filaments. Combining nonlinear rod theory, simulations, and high-throughput robotic arm experiments, we establish a predictive pathway map and identify snap-through as a robust mechanism for repeatable motion amplification under simple boundary actuation. Guided by this map, we design a snap-actuated helical limb that converts small end rotations into rapid global reconfiguration and cyclic energy release. Integrated into an untethered robot, this limb enables sustained hopping across wood, cloth, acrylic, leather, grass, and sand, reaching 3.21 body lengths per second with an electrical cost of transport of 4.79. Controlled comparisons with a rigid-legged robot show that snap-through drives the gains in speed, efficiency, and terrain robustness. The same limb architecture also enables agile turning, repeated back-flips, and swimming.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.