ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Domain classification of archaeal proteomes reveals conserved fold repertoire.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Archaea represent one of the three domains of cellular life and yet account for fewer than 1% of experimentally determined protein structures, leaving the extent of their structural novelty unknown. Here we present a systematic domain-level classification of 124,075 proteins from 65 archaeal classes spanning 21 phyla and all major lineages, using both AFDB and newly predicted AlphaFold3 structures classified against the Evolutionary Classification of protein Domains (ECOD). Archaeal proteins span 987 of the 2,457 ECOD X-groups defined across all cellular life, roughly 40% of known fold diversity captured within a single domain of life. Clustering by Foldseek recovered structural relationships for 63% of domains that are singletons by sequence comparison. To characterize the 21% of proteins lacking high-confidence classification, we applied successive filters for structure prediction confidence, protein length, and structural cluster context, reducing 8,452 domain-free proteins to a small number of well-folded structural orphans (less than 0.1% of the dataset). The unclassified fraction is dominated by sub-threshold matches (matches below the 0.85 DPAM confidence cutoff for high-confidence T-group assignment) to known folds (14% of all proteins) and low-confidence structure predictions (5%), not by novel structures. These results demonstrate that the protein fold repertoire at the single-domain level is broadly conserved across the deepest phylogenetic distances in cellular life, and that the gap between archaeal and well-characterized proteomes reflects classification sensitivity for divergent sequences rather than unexplored structural diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.