ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Direct microhaplotype genotyping for GT-seq (Genotyping-in-Thousands by Sequencing) using a diploid abundance model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GT-seq (Genotyping-in-Thousands by Sequencing) is widely used for high-throughput amplicon genotyping, but most analytical pipelines focus on single SNPs or rely on alignment-based variant calling. Here we present a direct microhaplotype genotyping framework that leverages the high read depth and low error rates typical of paired-end Illumina and Element sequencing. The pipeline first identifies primer-bounded reads and resolves paired-end sequences into quality-aware consensus amplicon sequences. Within each sample and locus, unique sequences are ranked by read abundance and the top one or two sequences are retained as directly observed haplotypes. These alleles are aggregated across samples to construct a catalog of observed haplotypes for each locus. In a second pass, reads are assigned to catalog haplotypes by exact sequence matching to produce diploid genotypes. Finally, catalog haplotype sequences are compared to identify phased SNP and collapsed indel variation. Optionally, catalog haplotypes may be aligned to a reference genome to project observed variants onto genomic coordinates and generate standards-compliant VCF output. This framework enables robust, microhaplotype genotyping directly from high-depth amplicon sequencing data. Comparison with an independent BWA/BCFtools alignment-based workflow demonstrated 99.67% genotype concordance across 102,520 genotype comparisons spanning 1,085 SNPs in 96 individuals. Genotype concordance remained above 99.4% even at the minimum supported sequencing depth of 10 reads per locus, demonstrating robust performance across a broad range of sequencing depths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.