Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758767›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Relapsing fever revisited: New insights into neglected borrelial infections.

Sally J Cutler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sally J CutlerInfection & Immunity Research Group, School of Health, Sport & Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-0651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why revisit our understanding of relapsing fever and their causative spirochaetes? We have seen many existing paradigms of relapsing fever borreliosis challenged over recent years, largely facilitated through technological molecular biological improvements. Concepts that were believed for many years are now being questioned; from the origins of B. recurrentis, the epidemic form of relapsing fever, through to the one-tick-one Borrelia model. Furthermore, the description of relapsing fever borreliae such as B. miyamotoi transmitted by hard tick species and increasing reports of new borrelial species have prompted a re-evaluation of existing knowledge. Within this narrative review, we overview existing knowledge of relapsing fever ecology, epidemiology, diagnostics, disease and prevention, and explore several research gaps worthy of further research.

Indexed as

BorreliaNeglected DiseasesRelapsing FeverAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42758767
PMCPMC13588337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.