Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758761›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

"Even with one Man, but with many women, you can get cervical cancer": Qualitative exploration of women's perceptions and experiences of cervical cancer screening in Uganda: A community-based study.

Robert M Bulamba, Fred Nalugoda, Amanda P Miller, Alex Daama, Godfrey Kigozi, Grace K Nalwoga, Stephen Watya, Emmanuel Kyasanku, Resty Nakajugo, Anna Mia Ekström and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Robert M BulambaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-5041
Fred NalugodaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Amanda P MillerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2252-6973
Alex DaamaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Godfrey KigoziDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Grace K NalwogaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Stephen WatyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Emmanuel KyasankuDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Resty NakajugoDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stocholm, Sweden.
Emma MenyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Violet NkwanziDepartment of Social Work, College of Health Sciences, East Tennessee State University (ETSU), East Tennessee, United States of America.
Ndejjo RawlanceDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH), KampalaUganda.
Juliana NamutunduDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH), KampalaUganda.
Steven MugambaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
William ByansiDepartment of Social Work, School of Social work Boston College, Boston, United States of America.
Jackline B NammandaDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.
Gertrude NakigoziDepartment of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Africa Medical and Behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO), KampalaUganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in low-resource settings, with Uganda being disproportionately affected. Despite the availability of screening services in Uganda, uptake remains unacceptably low, yet population-level data on women's perceptions and experienced barriers to screening remain limited. This hinders the development of targeted community-based interventions for cervical cancer screening in the country. To close this gap, we explored perceptions, attitudes, knowledge, and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women aged 25-65 years in the urban and rural areas of Wakiso District, Uganda. We conducted six focus group discussions - three in rural and three in urban with sixty women, and four key informant interviews with District health officers and healthcare providers in the urban and rural communities. Knowledge levels varied regarding cervical cancer risk factors, causes, signs, symptoms, and prevention. Participants in the focus group discussions linked cervical cancer to risky sexual behaviors, particularly involving multiple sexual partners or sexual intercourse with uncircumcised men, while some key informants said that some women believed that the disease was due to witchcraft. Concerns were also raised about family planning methods such as Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) and pills, which some participants believed to cause cervical cancer. Poor hygiene practices, including the use of unclean public toilets and poor menstrual hygiene, were also seen as risk factors. Myths and misconceptions about cervical cancer screening, such as fears of removal of the cervix during screening, were prevalent. Although some women had positive experiences with screening, concerns about pain, discomfort, and limited privacy during screening were commonly reported. While knowledge of cervical cancer exists among women in Wakiso District, significant misconceptions, fears, and systemic barriers impede screening uptake. Culturally sensitive health education and accessible, respectful screening services are critical to improving participation.

Identifiers

PMID42758761
PMCPMC13588353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.