ArticlePloS one2026
Relative and absolute reliability of medial knee joint space width measurement using ultrasound imaging during valgus stress testing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate both the relative and absolute reliability of ultrasound-based measurements of changes in medial knee joint space width under valgus stress in healthy individuals. Seventeen healthy adult males (34 knees) underwent ultrasound assessments under unloaded and valgus-loaded (10 Nm) conditions. The medial knee joint space width was measured using a standardized ultrasound protocol, and changes were calculated as the difference between loaded and unloaded conditions. Intra- and inter-rater reliability between two physical therapists with different experience levels were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, and absolute reliability was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level. A significant increase in medial knee joint space width (ranging from 1.33 to 1.41 mm) was observed under valgus stress compared to the unloaded condition (p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-rater reliability across two separate measurement days was 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.94), whereas that for inter-rater reliability was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92). Bland-Altman analysis revealed only random measurement error, with minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level values below 1.0 mm (0.51 mm intra-rater; 0.65 mm inter-rater). Ultrasound imaging could provide sufficient reliability to quantify changes in medial knee joint space width during valgus stress testing in healthy individuals. These values suggest that changes exceeding these thresholds may reflect changes beyond measurement error. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and involving patients with ligamentous injuries are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.