ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Amplifying Coaches' voices from the implementation of the MindSKILLZ youth mental health program in Kenya: A critical discourse analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young implementers bring valuable insights that can help inform and create effective mental health support systems and interventions tailored to their needs and unique experiences. However, their perspectives are often overlooked. This qualitative study analysed discourses from community role models, referred to as MindSKILLZ Coaches. We hosted five focus group discussions and collected 30 personal stories journaled by MindSKILLZ Coaches in Nairobi and Mombasa counties between August 2023 and March 2024. We were interested in understanding their experiences implementing a mental health intervention for young people during a pilot study, including any perceived program impacts on Coaches themselves and youth participants.This was done to identify implementation successes and challenges, improve use of language in developing materials for program implementation, strengthen institutional guidelines for learning materials and generate evidence to inform future program delivery, adaptation and scale-up. Data were analysed using Fairclough's Model for Critical Discourse Analysis to examine three interconnected discourses: 1) textual practice (micro level), 2) discursive practice (meso level), and 3) social practice (macro level). Across these levels, we looked at how discourse contributes to the maintenance of social power relations, ideologies, and institutional practices. Findings revealed that the MindSKILLZ program positively impacted the Coaches and youth participants by improving self-esteem, use of creative approaches to reach persons with disability, and improvement of academic performance, all of which facilitated successful program implementation overall. Institutional practices (e.g., assumptions of uniform cultural practices among participants), structural power imbalances (e.g., limitations on Coaches' roles in program implementation) and social relations (e.g., Coaches simplified language reinforcing their authority) limited the program's effectiveness. Amplifying the Coaches' voices enhances adoption of a grassroots perspective, which can challenge unequal power dynamics. The use of grassroots insights can aid in co-creating more equitable and effective mental health interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.